Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025
Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
Deep Learning-Based CT Reconstruction Kernel Conversion in the Quantification of Interstitial Lung Disease: Effect on
Yura Ahn1, Sang Min Lee1, Yujin Nam2
1Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea (Y.A., S.M.L., J.C., K.-H.D., J.B.S.).
Rationale And Objectives:
The effect of different computed tomography (CT) reconstruction kernels on the quantification of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has not been clearly demonstrated. The study aimed to investigate the effect of reconstruction kernels on the quantification of ILD on CT and determine whether deep learning-based kernel conversion can reduce the variability of automated quantification results between different CT kernels.
Materials And Methods:
Patients with ILD or interstitial lung abnormality who underwent noncontrast high-resolution CT between June 2022 and September 2022 were retrospectively included. Images were reconstructed with three different kernels: B30f, B50f, and B60f. B60f was regarded as the reference standard for quantification, and B30f and B50f images were converted to B60f images using a deep learning-based algorithm. Each disease pattern of ILD and the fibrotic score were quantified using commercial software. The effect of kernel conversion on measurement variability was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method.
Results:
A total of 194 patients were included in the study. Application of different kernels induced differences in the quantified extent of each pattern. Reticular opacity and honeycombing were underestimated on B30f images and overestimated on B50f images. After kernel conversion, measurement variability was reduced (mean difference, from -2.0 to 3.9 to -0.3 to 0.4%, and 95% limits of agreement [LOA], from [-5.0, 12.7] to [-2.7, 2.1]). The fibrotic score for converted B60f from B50f images was almost equivalent to the original B60f (ICC, 1.000; mean difference, 0.0; and 95% LOA [-0.4, 0.4]).
Conclusion:
Quantitative CT analysis of ILD was affected by the application of different kernels, but deep learning-based kernel conversion effectively reduced measurement variability, improving the reproducibility of quantification.
