Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
ChatGPT for Sample-Size Calculation in Sports Medicine and Exercise Sciences: A Cautionary Note
Jabeur Methnani1,2, Imed Latiri3, Ismail Dergaa4,5,6
1LR19ES09, Laboratoire de Physiologie de l'Exercice et Physiopathologie: de l'Intégré au Moléculaire "Biologie, Médecine et Santé," Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse,Tunisia.
ChatGPT accurately calculated sample size for only one of four sport science studies, highlighting potential errors in AI-driven research calculations. Further validation is needed for these emerging tools.
Area of Science:
- Sport Sciences
- Sports Medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate sample size calculation is crucial for the validity and statistical power of research studies in sport sciences and sports medicine.
- Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT offer potential for assisting researchers, but their reliability for complex statistical tasks requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT in calculating sample sizes for sport sciences and sports medicine research.
- To identify potential errors and inconsistencies in LLM-generated sample size calculations.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of four published sport science/medicine research papers with varying study designs.
- Inputting all necessary statistical data (mean, SD, Z-values) and study design details into ChatGPT.
- Re-prompting ChatGPT with identical information to assess response reproducibility.
Main Results:
- ChatGPT correctly calculated the sample size for only one of the four studies (a randomized controlled trial).
- The LLM failed to correctly identify the appropriate formula for a survey paper's sample size calculation.
- Re-using the same prompt for one example yielded a different sample size calculation, indicating inconsistency.
Conclusions:
- Current LLMs like ChatGPT may produce errors and inconsistencies in sample size calculations, even with complete and accurate input.
- Researchers must exercise caution when using AI tools for statistical calculations and verify results.
- Future research should explore more advanced AI models and their capabilities in supporting scientific research tasks.
More Related Videos
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Bootstrapping
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...