Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.3K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.3K
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

292
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
292
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The attentional boost effect overcomes dual-task interference in choice-response tasks.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Stability of individual differences in implicitly guided attention.

Chen Chen1, Vanessa G Lee1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|August 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in implicit location probability learning (LPL) are stable across tasks, but only when the underlying search processes are similar. This suggests shared cognitive mechanisms influence spatial learning.

Keywords:
Individual differencesimplicit learninglocation probability learningselection history effectsvisual search

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Implicit spatial learning, or location probability learning (LPL), demonstrates how individuals develop preferences for locations associated with frequent targets.
  • Previous research primarily focused on group averages, overlooking the stability of individual differences in LPL.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the stability of individual differences in implicit location probability learning (LPL).
  • To determine if LPL individual differences remain consistent across different task variants, particularly when search processes differ.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments involving implicit location probability learning (LPL) tasks were conducted.
  • Participants engaged in visual search tasks where target locations had probabilistic regularities.
  • Experiment 1 used T-among-Ls and 5-among-2s search tasks with differing spatial probabilities; Experiment 2 used a camouflaged-T task and a standard T-among-Ls task.

Main Results:

  • Location probability learning (LPL) transferred between tasks in Experiment 1, and individual differences in learning were stable.
  • In Experiment 2, learning was task-specific, with no transfer or correlation in individual differences between the camouflaged-T and standard T-among-Ls tasks.
  • Stable individual differences in LPL were observed only when the search processes across task variants were shared.

Conclusions:

  • Implicit location probability learning (LPL) is associated with stable individual differences.
  • The stability of these individual differences is contingent upon the shared cognitive processes underlying the task variants.
  • This highlights the importance of task-specific search mechanisms in shaping stable individual learning patterns.