Why Is It So Hard to Evaluate Knowledge Exchange? Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical...

Area of Science:

• Health Research
• Science and Technology Studies (STS)

Background:

• Knowledge translation (KT) activities and evaluations are growing, but evidence of efficacy remains elusive.
• Evaluating KT interventions faces significant political and logistical challenges.
• Current KT evaluations often rely on health research traditions, emphasizing comparability and efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a novel framework for understanding and evaluating knowledge translation.
• To shift the focus from traditional efficacy metrics to the interactive processes of knowledge exchange.

Main Methods:

• Applying theories from Science and Technology Studies (STS).
• Conceptualizing 'context' as a mutual creation rather than a static environment.
• Viewing institutional influence on behavior beyond mere platforms for evidence mobilization.

Main Results:

• A new perspective on KT evaluations by focusing on the work involved in moving knowledge across community boundaries.
• Understanding relationships as active interactions, not just passive conduits for evidence.
• Recognizing context and institutions as dynamic, co-created elements influencing knowledge mobilization.

Conclusions:

• Rethinking KT as a creative, active practice offers innovative approaches to designing and evaluating KT mechanisms.
• The STS-informed perspective provides a more nuanced understanding of the complexities inherent in knowledge exchange.
• This framework can enhance the effectiveness and evaluation of knowledge translation efforts in research and practice.