Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Observational Learning

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...

Law of Effect

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...

Reinforcement

Reinforcement

Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A systematic investigation reveals dissociable effects of ageing on implicit and explicit components of sensorimotor learning.

Nature human behaviour·2026

Same author

Minimal Impact of Low Vision on Explicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026

Same author

How to conduct behavioural experiments online.

Nature human behaviour·2026

Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same author

Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

Implicit reward-based motor learning.

Nina M van Mastrigt¹, Jonathan S Tsay², Tianhe Wang²

¹Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.m.van.mastrigt@vu.nl.

Experimental Brain Research

|August 14, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Binary feedback, indicating success or failure, drives motor learning and even implicit learning. This simple feedback can recalibrate sensorimotor maps, challenging previous learning theories.

Keywords:

Implicit learning Reinforcement learning Reward Reward-based motor learning Use-dependent learning Visuomotor rotation

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Motor Control
Cognitive Psychology

Background:

Binary feedback (task success/failure) is known to drive motor learning.
While it induces explicit strategy adjustments, its role in implicit learning is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if binary feedback alone can induce implicit motor learning.
To examine the nature of implicit learning under binary feedback conditions.

Main Methods:

Participants performed a center-out reaching task with gradual, unseen rotations.
Binary feedback was provided based on movement through a reward zone.
Implicit learning was assessed via a no-feedback aftereffect phase and generalization targets.

Main Results:

Participants adapted their movements significantly, achieving ~95% of the imposed rotation.
A small but robust aftereffect (2-3°) indicated implicit learning occurred.
Generalization to flanking targets supported the aftereffect, contradicting use-dependent learning hypotheses.

Conclusions:

Binary feedback is sufficient to induce implicit motor learning.
The findings suggest binary feedback recalibrates sensorimotor maps, rather than solely relying on use-dependent mechanisms.
This challenges existing models of implicit motor learning.