Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Gender-Based Disparity in Acute Stroke Imaging Utilization and the Impact on Treatment and Outcomes: 2012 to 2021
Jason J Wang1, Jeffrey M Katz2, Maria Sanmartin3
1Imaging Clinical Effectiveness and Outcomes Research, Center for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York; and Professor and Health Economist, Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York.
Introduction:
Prior studies have revealed significant socio-economic disparities in neuro-imaging and treatment utilization for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this study, we sought to evaluate whether a sex-based disparity exists in neuro-imaging and to determine its etiology and association with acute treatment and outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with AIS admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2021. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, neuro-imaging, acute treatment, and early clinical outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical records. Trend analysis, bivariate analysis of patient characteristics by sex, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted.
Results:
Of the 7,540 AIS episodes registered from 2012 to 2021, 47.9% were female patients. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and temporal factors, significantly higher utilization of CTA was found for male patients (odds ratio = 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.07-1.34]), particularly from socio-economically advantaged groups, and in years 2015 and 2019, representing the years endovascular thrombectomy recommendations changed. Despite this, male patients had significantly lower intravenous thrombolysis utilization (odds ratio = 0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.96]) and similar endovascular thrombectomy rates as female patients. There were no significant sex differences in early clinical outcomes, and no relevant clinical or demographic factors explained the CT angiography utilization disparity.
Conclusion:
Despite higher CT angiography utilization in socio-economically advantaged male patients with AIS, likely overutilization due to implicit biases following guideline updates, the rates of acute treatment, and early clinical outcomes were unaffected.
