Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

802
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
802

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward autonomous robotic-assisted and microrobotic surgery.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Investigating robot control policy learning for autonomous x-ray-guided spine procedures.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

Standardization of surgical gesture taxonomy: a SAGES Delphi consensus study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Relationships between rest-activity rhythms, cancer-related fatigue, and quality of life: Results from a time-restricted eating randomized controlled trial.

Chronobiology international·2026
Same author

Vision-based augmented reality guidance for setting up robot-assisted spine surgery.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

Current validation practice undermines surgical AI development.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Cross-Attention Fusion of B-Mode Ultrasound and Strain Elastography for Tumor Segmentation in Robotics-Assisted Surgery.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2026
Same journal

A Pneumatically Actuated Robotic Assistant for MRI-Guided Stereotactic Neurosurgery.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2026
Same journal

Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Surgical Data Science: Revising Its Benefits for Surgical Stakeholders and Patients.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2026
Same journal

Concentric Tube Robot-Assisted Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: Validation in an Ovine Model.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2026
Same journal

Autonomous Slip-Prevention Grip Force Control and Its Potential in Shared Control of Robotic Prosthetic Hands.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2026
Same journal

Modeling and Control For Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2025

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy
11:53

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

11.7K

Control of Magnetic Surgical Robots With Model-Based Simulators and Reinforcement Learning.

Yotam Barnoy1, Onder Erin2, Suraj Raval3

  • 1Department of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.

IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
|August 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Model-based simulation (MBS) accelerates reinforcement learning (RL) for magnetic medical robots. This approach trains RL 200x faster than real-world training, significantly improving autonomous control accuracy for safer surgical procedures.

Keywords:
Autonomous ControlMagnetic RobotsReinforcement LearningSurgical Robotics

More Related Videos

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
10:34

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

15.1K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2025

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy
11:53

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

11.7K
Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
10:34

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

15.1K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Magnetically manipulated medical robots offer miniaturization and tetherless actuation.
  • Autonomous control is key for safe and accurate robotic surgery.
  • Classical control methods struggle with complex, dynamic environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply model-free reinforcement learning (RL) to magnetic needle manipulation.
  • To overcome the impractical long runtimes of RL in real-world surgical robotics.
  • To develop a faster, more accurate autonomous control method for medical robots.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a model-based simulation (MBS) using guided real-world exploration to learn environment dynamics.
  • Applied RL within the MBS environment for intensive training.
  • Transferred learned behaviors from MBS to the real-world system.

Main Results:

  • The MBS approach achieved a 6 mm root-mean-square (RMS) error for a square trajectory.
  • RL training in MBS was approximately 200 times faster than real-world training.
  • Pure simulation-based methods resulted in a 31 mm RMS error, demonstrating poor transferability.

Conclusions:

  • Model-based simulation (MBS) environments are effective for accelerating RL in domains where real-world training is impractical.
  • This method significantly improves the speed and accuracy of autonomous control for magnetic medical robots.
  • MBS provides a viable solution for developing robust control strategies when accurate simulations are initially unavailable.