Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

202
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
202
Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

2.3K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
2.3K
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

360
Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished.
360
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

1.4K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.4K
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

80
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
80
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

119
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
119

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agreements and disagreements with resource-rational contractualism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

The Political Psychology of Economic Inequality.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2026
Same author

Social Tinkering: The Social Foundations of Cultural Complexity.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Willful inattention: Keeping aversive information out of mind.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Hunting for Paradoxes: A Research Strategy for Cognitive Science.

Topics in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Noise in Cognition: Bug or Feature?

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2025
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.7K

Where next for behavioral public policy?

Nick Chater1, George Loewenstein2

  • 1Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK nick.chater@wbs.ac.uk; https://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/nick-chater/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|August 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Behavioral science should shift from individual-focused (i-frame) to system-focused (s-frame) policy interventions. This approach counters corporate tactics that favor ineffective individual changes over essential systemic reforms.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms in Fruit Flies — Genetic Models and Behavioral Tests
08:30

Author Spotlight: Exploring Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms in Fruit Flies — Genetic Models and Behavioral Tests

Published on: September 6, 2024

1.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.7K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms in Fruit Flies — Genetic Models and Behavioral Tests
08:30

Author Spotlight: Exploring Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms in Fruit Flies — Genetic Models and Behavioral Tests

Published on: September 6, 2024

1.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Public Policy
  • Societal Problem-Solving
  • Policy Intervention Frameworks

Background:

  • Societal problems are addressed through individual-level (i-frame) or system-level (s-frame) interventions.
  • Corporations often promote the i-frame to obstruct systemic change, framing individual interventions as alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To distinguish between i-frame and s-frame policy approaches.
  • To address concerns that behavioral science's i-frame focus inadvertently supports corporate obstruction of systemic reform.
  • To clarify the role of behavioral public policy in supporting systemic reforms against special interests.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis distinguishing between i-frame and s-frame policy approaches.
  • Response to commentators, identifying common themes and constructive suggestions.
  • Argumentation for the role of behavioral public policy in supporting systemic reforms.

Main Results:

  • The i-frame focus in behavioral science may inadvertently reinforce ineffective individual interventions.
  • Powerful special interests often oppose systemic reforms supported by broad policy consensus.
  • Behavioral public policy can help build support for necessary systemic changes.

Conclusions:

  • A shift towards the s-frame in behavioral public policy is crucial for effective societal problem-solving.
  • Behavioral science must actively support systemic reforms rather than inadvertently hindering them.
  • Clarifying pathways to build public and policy support for systemic change is a key role for behavioral public policy.