Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Rapid Isolation of BMPR-IB+ Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells for Use in a Calvarial Defect Healing Model
Published on: February 24, 2017
Treatment of infected bone defects with the induced membrane technique
Jie Shen1,2,3, Zhiyuan Wei3, Shulin Wang3
1Trauma Medical Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Aims:
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the induced membrane technique for treating infected bone defects, and to explore the factors that might affect patient outcomes.
Methods:
A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2021. Studies with a minimum sample size of five patients with infected bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique were included. Factors associated with nonunion, infection recurrence, and additional procedures were identified using logistic regression analysis on individual patient data.
Results:
After the screening, 44 studies were included with 1,079 patients and 1,083 segments of infected bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique. The mean defect size was 6.8 cm (0.5 to 30). After the index second stage procedure, 85% (797/942) of segments achieved union, and 92% (999/1,083) of segments achieved final healing. The multivariate analysis with data from 296 patients suggested that older age was associated with higher nonunion risk. Patients with external fixation in the second stage had a significantly higher risk of developing nonunion, increasing the need for additional procedures. The autografts harvested from the femur reamer-irrigator-aspirator increased nonunion, infection recurrence, and additional procedure rates.
Conclusion:
The induced membrane technique is an effective technique for treating infected bone defects. Internal fixation during the second stage might effectively promote bone healing and reduce additional procedures without increasing infection recurrence. Future studies should standardize individual patient data prospectively to facilitate research on the affected patient outcomes.
Insights
The induced membrane technique effectively treats infected bone defects, achieving high healing rates. Older age and external fixation increase nonunion risk, while specific autografts may worsen outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Regenerative Medicine
- Bone Defect Management
Background:
- Infected bone defects pose significant challenges in orthopedic treatment.
- The induced membrane technique offers a promising approach for bone regeneration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the induced membrane technique for infected bone defects.
- To identify factors influencing patient outcomes, including nonunion and infection recurrence.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2021.
- Inclusion of studies with at least five patients treated with the induced membrane technique.
- Logistic regression analysis of individual patient data to identify risk factors.
Main Results:
- 44 studies comprising 1,079 patients and 1,083 bone defect segments were analyzed.
- 85% union and 92% final healing rates were achieved after the second stage procedure.
- Older age, external fixation, and specific autograft harvesting methods were associated with increased risks of nonunion, infection recurrence, and additional procedures.
Conclusions:
- The induced membrane technique is a highly effective treatment for infected bone defects.
- Internal fixation in the second stage may improve bone healing and reduce complications.
- Standardized prospective data collection is recommended for future research.
More Related Videos
11:20Site-Directed Immobilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Solid Surfaces by Click Chemistry
Published on: March 29, 2018
09:35Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect
Published on: September 11, 2015