Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
Evaluating augmented reality e-typodont to improve a patient's dental implant health literacy
Cortino Sukotjo1, Dominique Erica Bertucci2, Javid Yunus Patel3
1Professor and Director, Predoctoral Implant Program, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Statement Of Problem:
Information regarding dental implants can be difficult to understand for participants. Improving patients' dental implant health literacy remains a challenging process.
Purpose:
The purpose of this clinical study was to develop and evaluate patients' understanding of the implant treatment procedure, components, and sequences using traditional typodont and augmented reality (AR) applications (e-typodont), with the goal of improving their oral health literacy.
Material And Methods:
Participants who had sought dental implant treatment at the group practice and implant clinic at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) College of Dentistry were invited to enroll in this study. Participants were asked to fill out the first questionnaire (Q1) assessing their understanding of implant treatment procedures, components, and sequences. The participants were randomly exposed to 1 of the 2 modes of delivering education, typodont or AR e-typodont. The participants were asked to complete the additional 2 questionnaires (Q2 and Q3), and the posttest questionnaire (Q1) to re-evaluate their understanding of the implant treatment procedure, components, and sequences. All data were entered and coded into a spreadsheet. Descriptive (mean) and statistical (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks and Mann-Whitney U test) analyses were used (α=.05).
Results:
Both interventions significantly increased participants' understanding of implant treatments (typodont: P=.004; e-typodont: P<.001), implant components (typodont: P=.003; e-typodont: P<.001), and implant treatment sequences (typodont: P=.001; e-typodont: P<.001). The e-typodont group significantly improved participants' understanding of implant treatments (P=.006), implant components (P=.023), and implant treatment sequences (P=.008) compared with the typodont group. Participants perceived the e-typodont mode of delivery to be significantly more interesting (P=.002), interactive (P=.008), educational (P=.002), user-friendly (P=.016), and "Wow" (P=.002) compared with the traditional typodont mode of delivery.
Conclusions:
Both interventions improved participants' understanding of implant treatment procedures, components, and sequences. The e-typodont showed better improvement in participants' understanding of dental implants compared with the traditional typodont.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
05:49Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024