Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
A comparative study of postnatal anthropometric growth in very preterm infants and intrauterine growth
Fu-Sheng Chou1,2, Hung-Wen Yeh3,4, Reese H Clark5
1Department of Neonatology, Kaiser Permanente Riverside Medical Center, Riverside, CA, USA. Fu-Sheng.X.Chou@kp.org.
Insights
Postnatal growth in very preterm infants differs significantly from intrauterine growth. New models show distinct growth phases, offering a practical tool for clinical assessment and nutrition research.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Growth and Development
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Current growth references for very preterm infants often rely on birth measurements, assuming they reflect intrauterine growth.
- The American Academy of Pediatrics' goal of approximating intrauterine growth rates for these infants remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop models characterizing postnatal growth patterns in very preterm infants.
- To compare these postnatal growth patterns with intrauterine growth.
- To assess the attainability of intrauterine growth rate approximation in very preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- Utilized real-world measurement data from very preterm infants born between 2010 and 2020.
- Developed models to analyze weight, length, and head circumference growth rates.
- Compared postnatal growth trajectories with established intrauterine growth data.
Main Results:
- Identified three distinct phases of postnatal weight growth, not observed in intrauterine growth.
- Postnatal length and head circumference growth showed an initial slow rate followed by acceleration.
- Demonstrated significant differences between overall postnatal and intrauterine growth patterns.
Conclusions:
- Postnatal growth in very preterm infants is fundamentally different from intrauterine growth.
- While not representing optimal growth, developed postnatal growth models are valuable for clinical assessment and nutrition research.
Abstract:
Most growth references for very preterm infants were developed using measurements taken at birth, and were thought to represent intrauterine growth. However, it remains unclear whether the goal of approximating an intrauterine growth rate as stated by the American Academy of Pediatrics is attainable by very preterm infants. Using real-world measurement data from very preterm infants born between 2010 through 2020, we develop models to characterize the patterns of postnatal growth, and compare them to intrauterine growth. By assessing the weight growth rate, we show three phases of postnatal growth not evident in intrauterine growth. Furthermore, postnatal length and head circumference growth exhibit a slow rate after birth, followed by an acceleration. Collectively, postnatal and intrauterine growth are distinctly different. Although postnatal growth models do not represent optimal growth of very preterm infants, they can serve as a practical tool for clinical assessment of growth and for nutrition research.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean

