Evaluation and comparison of knowledge translation patterns in selected countries with Iran: A comparative study

Area of Science:

• Health Systems Research
• Policy Implementation
• Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

• Inefficiencies in health systems stem from poor communication between researchers and policymakers.
• Knowledge translation (KT) bridges the gap between research findings and health policy/practice.
• Lack of evidence utilization hinders effective case management.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the status and models of knowledge translation in select countries.
• To analyze KT frameworks using the Policy Triangle framework.
• To identify facilitators and barriers to KT implementation.

Main Methods:

• Comparative analysis of knowledge translation models from 2005-2020.
• Review of databases from reputable health centers and governments.
• Application of Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle framework (context, content, process, actors).

Main Results:

• Knowledge translation is a policy priority in Iran, USA, and Canada.
• USA and Canada possess developed strategies and infrastructure for KT implementation.
• Iran's centralized health system presents a barrier; KT efforts are mainly academic.

Conclusions:

• Iran is developing its capacity for knowledge translation.
• Cooperation with policymakers is crucial for strengthening KT interventions in Iran.