Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Effect of customized abutment taper configuration on bone remodeling and peri-implant tissue around implant-supported
Pongsakorn Poovarodom1, Chaiy Rungsiyakull2, Jarupol Suriyawanakul3
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Purpose:
The optimal configuration of a customized implant abutment plays a crucial role in promoting bone remodeling and maintaining the peri-implant gingival contour. However, the biomechanical effects of abutment configuration on bone remodeling and peri-implant tissue remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of abutment taper configurations on bone remodeling and peri-implant tissue.
Materials And Methods:
Five models with different abutment taper configurations (10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, and 50°) were analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the biomechanical responses in peri-implant bone and the hydrostatic pressure in peri-implant tissue.
Results:
The results demonstrated that the rate of increase in bone density was similar in all models. On the other hand, the hydrostatic pressure in peri-implant gingiva revealed significantly different results. Model 10° showed the highest maximum and volume-averaged hydrostatic pressures (69.31 and 4.5 mmHg), whereas Model 30° demonstrated the lowest values (57.83 and 3.88 mmHg) with the lowest excessive pressure area. The area of excessive hydrostatic pressure decreased in all models as the degree of abutment taper increased from 10° to 30°. In contrast, Models 40° and 50° exhibited greater hydrostatic pressure concentration at the cervical region.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the abutment taper configuration had a slight effect on bone remodeling but exerted a significant effect on the peri-implant gingiva above the implant platform via hydrostatic pressure. Significant decreases in greatest and average hydrostatic pressures were observed in the peri-implant tissues of Model 30°. However, the results indicate that implant abutment tapering wider than 40° could result in a larger area of excessive hydrostatic pressure in peri-implant tissue, which could induce gingival recession.
