Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Real world single center experience with saphenous vein grafts interventions: should filters be filtered out?
Adman Kassier1, Ronak Soni, Kameel Kassab
1Ascension Borgess Hospital, Michigan State University and Western Michigan University, 1521 Gull Rd, GOC 327, Kalamazoo, MI 49048. Adnan.kassier@gmail.com.
Insights
The Borgess protocol, using intracoronary nicardipine and direct stenting, offers a promising alternative to embolic protection devices for saphenous vein graft interventions, showing favorable outcomes and reduced major adverse cardiovascular events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) faces challenges like no-reflow and myocardial injury due to distal embolization and vasoconstriction.
- Current guidelines recommend embolic protection devices (EPDs) for SVG PCI, but their effectiveness has been suboptimal in many studies.
- The Borgess protocol, involving prophylactic intracoronary nicardipine and direct stenting, is presented as an alternative to EPDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Borgess protocol as an alternative to EPDs in saphenous vein graft interventions.
- To assess the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following SVG interventions using the Borgess protocol.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study of 424 consecutive SVG interventions performed between 2017 and 2021.
- The primary outcome was 30-day MACE, defined as death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
- Data on adherence to the Borgess protocol and use of intracoronary nicardipine were collected.
Main Results:
- The study included 424 SVG interventions, with 76% presenting with acute coronary syndrome.
- The Borgess protocol was fully adhered to in 36% of cases, and intracoronary nicardipine was used in 72%.
- The 30-day MACE rate was 3.5%, primarily driven by myocardial infarction (2.6%).
Conclusions:
- The Borgess protocol demonstrated favorable outcomes in SVG interventions compared to SVG PCI strategies using EPDs.
- This approach may offer a viable alternative for managing complex SVG interventions.
- Further research is warranted, acknowledging the limitations of this single-center, retrospective study.
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) can be challenging due to no reflow phenomenon from distal embolization of debris and microvascular vasoconstriction, resulting in myocardial injury post-procedure. Guidelines promote the use of distal embolic protection devices (EPD) to protect the distal arterial bed during SVG PCI. However, this approach has shown less-than-optimal results in many studies. We report our data using the Borgess protocol [prophylactic intracoronary (IC) nicardipine injection and direct stenting], as an alternative to EPDs in a large series of SVG interventions.
Methods:
This is a retrospective, cohort study of our single center experience with SVG interventions between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [a composite of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 30 days post-procedure.
Results:
There were 424 consecutive SVG interventions performed during the study period, and 76% of cases presented with acute coronary syndrome. Full adherence to the Borgess protocol was observed in 36% of cases; IC nicardipine was utilized in 72% of cases. MACE rate was 3.5% at 30 days driven primarily by MI (2.6%).
Conclusion:
The Borgess protocol approach to vein graft interventions proved good outcomes when compared to SVG PCI in randomized trials utilizing EPDs. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature and single center experience.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins I: Introduction

