Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
Published on: February 20, 2021
Optimization of the Eclipse TPS beam configuration parameters for small field dosimetry using Monte Carlo simulations
Tony Younes1, Frédéric Chatrie2, Marianne Zinutti3
1Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France; Laboratoire de "Mathématiques et Applications", Unité de recherche "Mathématiques et Modélisation", Centre d'analyses et de recherche, Faculté des sciences, Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth 1104 2020, Lebanon.
Purpose:
To evaluate the impact of tuning the beam configurations parameters on the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm for small fields using Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
Methods:
The TrueBeam STx with the high-definition 120 multi-leaf collimator (HD120-MLC) was modeled with Geant4 application for emission tomography (GATE) Monte Carlo platform and validated against measurements. The impact of varying the effective spot size (ESS) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) on AAA and AXB calculations was carried out for small MLC-fields ranging from 0.5×0.5 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2. Beam penumbras, field sizes and output factors calculated by AAA and AXB were compared to GATE calculations and measurements.
Results:
The beam penumbra comparisons showed that the best ESS value for AXB was about 1.0 mm in the crossplane direction and 0.5 mm in the inplane direction. By optimizing the ESS values, AXB could provide output factor results almost within 2% of GATE calculations and measurements for fields down to 0.5×0.5 cm2. For AAA, significant output factor differences were observed for all ESS values and tuning the DLG in addition to the ESS optimization resulted in an absorbed dose difference of less than 2.5% for MLC-fields down to 1 × 1 cm2.
Conclusion:
By optimizing the ESS values, AXB can achieve accurate output factors in the case of small MLC-fields without the need of DLG tuning. Nevertheless, compromises between the output factor, DLG and ESS values were found necessary for AAA calculations. A MLC model improvement would allow to avoid the complexity related to tuning the configuration parameters.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019