Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Quantifying the Importance of Active Muscle Repositioning a Finite Element Neck Model in Flexion Using Kinematic,
Prasannaah Hadagali1, Steven L Fischer2, Jack P Callaghan2
1Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Repositioning finite element neck models with active muscles improves accuracy in simulating impact scenarios. This muscle-based method better reflects in vivo responses than traditional boundary conditions, enhancing injury risk analysis.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Computational Modeling
- Injury Biomechanics
Background:
- Non-neutral neck positions are critical initial conditions in impact events, often linked to increased injury rates.
- Current finite element (FE) neck models typically use applied boundary conditions (BCs) for repositioning, which may not fully replicate in vivo muscle activity.
- In vivo, neck muscles actively contract to achieve and maintain head and neck posture, generating intrinsic loads.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a novel muscle-based repositioning method against traditional applied boundary conditions (BCs) in a contemporary FE neck model.
- To evaluate the impact of these different repositioning methods on forward head flexion of 30°.
- To assess the accuracy of kinematic and tissue-level responses.
Main Methods:
- A finite element neck model was utilized for forward head flexion simulation.
- The boundary condition (BC) method involved applying an external moment (2.6 Nm) to the head with the first thoracic vertebra (T1) fixed.
- The muscle-based method simulated co-contraction of neck flexor and extensor muscles under gravity loading to achieve the target 30° flexion.
Main Results:
- The muscle contraction method yielded a kinematic response within 10% of in vivo experimental data, outperforming the BC method (18% difference).
- Intervertebral disc forces calculated using muscle contraction (167 N compression, 12 N shear) were consistent with literature values, unlike the BC method which underpredicted forces.
- Muscle contraction led to a 60% average increase in annulus fibrosus strains across all levels compared to the BC method.
Conclusions:
- The muscle repositioning method significantly enhances the kinetic response and tissue-level outcomes in FE neck models compared to conventional BCs.
- Active muscle repositioning provides a more accurate simulation of in vivo neck kinematics and kinetics.
- These findings underscore the importance of incorporating active muscle function for realistic FE neck model simulations of non-neutral positions.
Related Concept Videos
Muscles that Move the Head
The bilateral sternocleidomastoid, or SCM, and the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles are significant head flexors. The SCM muscles originate at the sternum and clavicle and attach to the mastoid process of the temporal bone. The SCM contracts bilaterally to bend the head forward, whereas...
Muscles of the Anterior Neck
Flexural Stress
Hooke's Law states that within the material's elastic limits, stress is directly proportional to strain. In a member experiencing a bending moment, the strain at any point is relative to...
Residual Stresses in Bending
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Axial and Appendicular Muscles
Axial Muscles
Axial muscles, situated along the body's midline, are intricately connected to the axial skeleton, which includes the skull, spine, ribs, and sternum. These muscles facilitate facial expressions and...

