Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

06:54
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
Published on: August 4, 2023
1.2K
Relationships between bilateral auditory brainstem activity and inter-implant interval in children with cochlear
Yan-Lin Wu1, Li Chen2, Han-Yu Zhu1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, Anhui, China.
Summary
Sequential bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) show delayed auditory pathway development. A shorter interval between bilateral CIs promotes balanced auditory brainstem pathway maturation.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) is a common treatment for profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
- The timing of sequential bilateral CI may influence the development of auditory pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how the interval between bilateral cochlear implantations affects the maturation of auditory brainstem pathways.
- To compare sequential versus simultaneous bilateral CI using electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs).
Main Methods:
- Fifty-eight children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were studied.
- 33 received sequential bilateral CIs, 25 received simultaneous bilateral CIs.
- Bilateral EABRs were recorded upon activation of the second CI.
Main Results:
- In sequential CI cases, wave III and V latencies were shorter on the first CI side compared to the second.
- Simultaneous CI showed similar latencies between sides.
- Longer intervals in sequential CI correlated with prolonged latencies and imbalanced pathway development.
Conclusions:
- Unilateral CI use aids ipsilateral auditory pathway maturation.
- Extended intervals between bilateral CIs lead to unbalanced auditory brainstem pathway development.
- Simultaneous or short-interval bilateral CI is recommended for optimal outcomes.

