Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Multimodality Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia
Published on: July 21, 2023
Index CT-Based Scoring Systems in Operative Blunt Bowel and Mesenteric Injury Identification
Ila Sethi1, Aidan E Aicher1, Marlene Zawin2
1Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
The Faget and Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS) have limited sensitivity for predicting surgery in blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI). Direct radiologist review of CT scans using BIPS improved accuracy for operative intervention decisions.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Abdominal Trauma
Background:
- Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) surgical management is challenging.
- Existing scoring systems like Faget and Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS) aim to guide surgical decisions.
- Efficacy of these scores in predicting operative intervention needs further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the Faget score and BIPS in determining the need for surgery in patients with BBMI.
- To compare the accuracy of retrospective scoring system application versus direct radiologist review of CT scans.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of adult blunt trauma patients with BBMI at a Level 1 trauma center (2009-2019).
- Analysis of patients with preoperative CT scans.
- Retrospective calculation of Faget and BIPS CT scores from reports and independent radiologist review of images for BIPS.
Main Results:
- Of 91 BBMI patients, 62 met inclusion criteria.
- Retrospective Faget score: Sensitivity 39.1%, Specificity 81.2%, PPV 85.7%.
- Retrospective BIPS score: Sensitivity 47.8%, Specificity 87.5%, PPV 91.7%.
- Attending radiologist BIPS review: Sensitivity 56.5%, Specificity 93.7%, PPV 96.3%.
Conclusions:
- Existing BBMI scoring systems show limited sensitivity but high positive predictive value for operative intervention.
- Direct radiologist review of CT images using BIPS enhances accuracy compared to retrospective scoring of reports.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
09:11Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model
Published on: February 14, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation