Social vulnerability and time to surgeon evaluation for primary hyperparathyroidism in a Massachusetts cohort
Reagan A Collins1, Jordan M Broekhuis2, Maria P Cote3
1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/ReaganACollins.
Background:
Identifying patients at risk for under-evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism is essential to minimizing long-term sequelae, including osteoporosis, nephrolithiasis, and cardiovascular disease. This study assessed the impact of social vulnerability on time-to-surgery evaluation among patients with primary hyperparathyroidism in a Massachusetts cohort.
Methods:
This is a retrospective review of patients from an institutional database with the first incident of hypercalcemia between 2010 and 2018 and subsequent biochemical diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. The overall social vulnerability index and social vulnerability index subthemes were merged with the institutional data via patient ZIP code. Patients were stratified into social vulnerability index quartiles, where quartile 4 represented the highest vulnerability. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were compared, and Cox regression was used to assess the association between social vulnerability index and time to surgeon evaluation.
Results:
Of 1,082 patients included, those with a higher social vulnerability index were less likely to be evaluated by a surgeon (quartile 1 social vulnerability index: 31.1% vs. quartile 2 social vulnerability index: 31.41% vs. quartile 3 social vulnerability index: 25.93% vs. quartile 4 social vulnerability index: 21.92%, P = .03). On adjusted analysis, patients with the highest vulnerability had a 33% lower estimated rate of surgeon evaluation and were seen 67 days later compared with patients with the lowest vulnerability (hazard ratio: 0.67, confidence interval 0.47-0.97, P = .032). Differential rates of surgical evaluation by vulnerability persisted for the social vulnerability index subthemes for socioeconomic status, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation.
Conclusion:
Among a Massachusetts cohort, highly vulnerable populations with primary hyperparathyroidism are at greater risk for under-evaluation by a surgeon, which may contribute to the development of long-term sequelae of their disease.
