Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Definitive birth control and the physician--ethical issues.

R J Sobel, B Gert

    Israel Journal of Medical Sciences
    |November 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Physicians navigate ethical dilemmas in sterilization procedures, defining rational requests and justifiable rejections. Key considerations include informed consent, potential regret, and physician obligations in birth control decisions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Estimating risks of de novo kidney diseases after living kidney donation.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
    Same author

    What information should physicians be required to know?

    Newsletter on philosophy and medicine·2004
    Same author

    A technique for presenting risk and outcome data to potential living renal transplant donors.

    Transplantation·2001
    Same author

    Common morality versus specified principlism: reply to Richardson.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2000
    Same author

    Ethical selection of living kidney donors.

    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2000
    Same author

    Misreading of bioethics, root and branch.

    The Hastings Center report·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Reproductive Health
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • Physicians face complex ethical considerations when managing patient requests for permanent birth control.
    • Sterilization procedures, such as tubal ligation, raise questions about patient autonomy, physician responsibility, and informed consent.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the ethical dimensions of physician involvement in sterilization procedures.
    • To define criteria for rational requests and justifiable rejections of sterilization.
    • To explore physician obligations, decision-making roles, and the significance of regret in patient choices.

    Main Methods:

    • Ethical analysis of physician roles in sterilization.
    • Definition of a rational request for tubal ligation.
    Keywords:
    BehaviorDecision MakingDelivery Of Health CareEthicsFamily PlanningFemale Sterilization--indicationsHealthHealth PersonnelInformed ConsentPhilosophical OverviewPhysiciansPolitical FactorsSocial SciencesSterilization, Sexual--indicationsTubal Ligation--indicationsTubal Occlusion

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of guidelines for decision-making regarding ligation.
  • Consideration of physician obligations and options.

    • Main Results:

    • Establishes criteria for a rational request for tubal ligation.
    • Outlines justifiable reasons for rejecting sterilization requests.
    • Highlights the physician's role in providing adequate information and discussing potential regret.
    • Addresses the implications of recommending alternative treatments.

    Conclusions:

    • Physician decision-making in sterilization requires careful ethical consideration of patient autonomy and potential regret.
    • Clear guidelines are needed to balance patient desires with ethical medical practice in permanent contraception.
    • Understanding the 'likelihood of regret' is crucial for ethical medical decision-making in sterilization.