Savings in CT Net Scan Energy Consumption: Assessment Using Dose Report Metrics and Comparison With Savings in Idle...

BACKGROUND. CT scanners' net scan state (i.e., image acquisition period) represents a potential target for energy savings through protocol adjustments. However, gauging CT energy savings is difficult without installing costly energy monitors. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to assess correlations between CT dose report metrics and energy consumption during the system net scan state and to compare theoretic energy savings from matching percentage reductions in energy consumption during net scan and idle system states. METHODS. Current sensors were installed on a single CT scanner. A phantom was scanned at varying kilovoltage settings and effective tube current-rotation time settings. A retrospective assessment was performed in 32 patients (mean age, 61.2 ± 17.9 [SD] years; 17 men, 15 women) who underwent 32 single-energy noncontrast abdominopelvic CT examinations from September 22, 2021, to September 27, 2021, on the same scanner. Correlations between dose report metrics and net scan energy consumption were assessed in the phantom and clinical scans, and equations were generated to derive net scan energy consumption from DLP. An additional retrospective assessment was performed in 1355 patients (mean age, 59.3 ± 16.9 years; 663 men, 692 women) who underwent 1728 single-energy noncontrast abdominopelvic CT examinations from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, on the same scanner to estimate net scan energy consumption per examination. This information was integrated with literature-derived values to compare estimated annual national energy savings resulting from 20% reductions in net scan and idle state energy consumption. RESULTS. Net scan energy consumption in the phantom scans showed high linear correlation with DLP (R² = 0.87), and, in the clinical scans, high linear correlation with CTDI_vol (R² = 0.89) and very high linear correlation with DLP (R = 0.92). When combining mean DLP in examinations performed in the 1-year interval, an equation relating DLP and net scan energy consumption and literature values estimated that annual national energy savings was 14.9 times greater (40,437,870 kWh/2,704,000 kWh) by targeting the idle state rather than net scan state. CONCLUSION. CT net scan energy savings can be inferred from reductions in dose report metrics. However, targeting net scan energy consumption has modest impact relative to targeting idle state energy consumption. CLINICAL IMPACT. Environmental sustainability efforts should target the idle state energy consumption of CT.