Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Effect of different ceramic systems on antagonist dental structure by microtomographic analysis
Gustavo Desiderio Frasnelli1, Graziela Bianchi Leoni1, Raquel Cassani1
1School of Dentistry, University of Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Objectives:
This study aims to identify the two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses and evaluate the loss of tooth structure in the tooth's different constituent elements and the ceramic antagonist's surface.
Methods:
In this study, three groups (n = 10) represented by different ceramic systems (lithium disilicate [GDis], lithium silicate reinforced with zirconia [GSil], and monolithic zirconia [GZir]) were evaluated. Each group obtained ten ceramic blocks and submitted them to the sintering/crystallization process. To carry out the wear test, healthy mandibular premolars were used as the specimens and the ceramic blocks as antagonists. The premolars were submitted to two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses using a computerized microtomography (µTC) before and after the wear test. The wear test was performed with 30 N and 300,000 cycles load, with occlusion, laterality, and disocclusion movements.
Results:
The statistical analysis comparing the loss of two-dimensional tooth structure showed a statistically significant difference among all groups (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis comparing the percentage of loss of three-dimensional tooth structure showed a statistically significant difference between groups GDis and GSil and between groups GDis and GZir. However, when comparing GSil with GZir, no statistically significant difference was found. The qualitative analysis of the teeth showed that GDis showed considerable enamel loss and dentin exposure, GSil showed enamel wear with flattening the cusp without dentin exposure, and GZir showed minimal enamel wear without dentin exposure. In the qualitative analysis of ceramic antagonists, more significant wear of the ceramic material for GDis was observed, followed by the GSil and GZir groups, respectively.
Significance:
The use of the lithium disilicate should be cautious, restricting it to areas with lower masticatory forces. Areas of higher masticatory forces showed a large amount of antagonist wear, with dentin involvement. This can lead to dentinal hypersensitivity, risk of compromising patients' occlusion, by harming group disocclusion guides, causing pain and temporomandibular disorders.
