Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Conditional Reprogramming of Pediatric Human Esophageal Epithelial Cells for Use in Tissue Engineering and Disease Investigation
Published on: March 22, 2017
The Lived Experience of Pediatric Gene Therapy: A Scoping Review
Laura Kimberly1,2, Cara Hunt2, Katherine Beaverson3
1Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
Understanding patient and family perspectives on pediatric gene therapy (GT) clinical trials is crucial. Research highlights the importance of clear communication and weighing risks and benefits for informed consent in these complex decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gene Therapy
- Clinical Trials
- Patient-Centered Research
Background:
- Pediatric gene therapy (GT) trials address diverse rare diseases, with participation involving both children and caregivers.
- Understanding the lived experiences of pediatric GT trial participants is limited.
- GT decision-making uniquely involves a child-caregiver dyad, necessitating insight into their perceptions of burdens and benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of the literature on patient and family experiences in pediatric GT clinical trials.
- To identify gaps in current research and understand the impact of pediatric GT on patients and families.
- To inform patient-centered approaches in pediatric GT research and policy.
Main Methods:
- Scoping review of existing literature on pediatric gene therapy clinical trials.
- Analysis of themes related to patient and caregiver perceptions and decision-making.
- Identification of research gaps concerning lived experiences versus expressed thoughts on GT.
Main Results:
- Key themes identified include: weighing risks and benefits, timing of participation, the value of clear communication, and impact on quality of life.
- Literature primarily focused on how patients/caregivers *think* about GT (safety, efficacy, risks) rather than their actual *experiences*.
- A gap exists in understanding the lived social, emotional, physical, and logistical aspects of pediatric GT trial participation.
Conclusions:
- Findings offer insights to enhance the informed consent process for pediatric gene therapy trials.
- Recommendations include developing patient- and family-centered educational materials and policies.
- Further research is needed to capture the actual lived experiences of pediatric gene therapy trial participants and their families.
Abstract:
Little is known about patients' and families' lived experiences of participating in pediatric gene therapy (GT) clinical trials. Currently, pediatric GT research targets a broad range of indications--including rare and ultra-rare diseases--which vary in severity and in the availability of alternative therapies. Pediatric GT differs meaningfully from adult GT because the decision to participate involves a dyad of both the child and parent or caregiver/s. It is critical to understand patients' and caregivers' perceptions and experiences of social, emotional, physical, and logistical burdens or benefits of participating in such trials, and how they weigh and prioritize these factors when deciding whether to participate. We conducted a scoping review of the current literature in this subject area with objectives to (1) provide an overview of existing literature, (2) identify gaps and areas for further research, and (3) better understand the lived impact of pediatric GT research on patients and their parents/caregivers. Four themes emerged, including (1) weighing risks and benefits (2) timing of GT trial participation, (3) value of clear communication, and (4) potential impact on quality of life. Notably, our sample surfaced articles about how patients/parents/caregivers were thinking about GT-their understanding of its safety, efficacy, and risks-rather than accounts of their experiences, which was our initial intention. Nevertheless, our findings offer useful insights to improve the informed consent process and promote a more patient- and family-centered approach. Moreover, our findings can contribute to patient advocacy organizations' efforts to develop educational materials tailored to patients' and families' expressed informational needs and perspectives, and can inform more patient- and family-centered policies from GT clinical trial sponsors.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
What is Genetic Engineering?
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
In-vitro Mutagenesis
Gene-Environment Interactions
Forced Transdifferentiation
Artificial...

