Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maintenance therapy in gynecologic malignancies: Current and future state.

Cancer·2026
Same author

Timeliness of Prostate Cancer Treatment in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare: More Similarities than Differences?

JCO oncology practice·2026
Same author

Change in walking cadence as a digital outcome measure of clinically meaningful improvement in gait speed and 6-minute walk test distance after a mobility intervention in older adults.

PloS one·2026
Same author

When Is the Right Time? A Qualitative Study of Timing of Specialty Palliative Care in Patients With Brain Tumors.

JCO oncology practice·2026
Same author

Examining the Use of Consumer Wearable Devices and Digital Tools for Stress Measurement in College Students: Scoping Review of Methods.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2026
Same author

What does the future hold for antibody-drug conjugate therapies in ovarian cancer?

Expert opinion on biological therapy·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Telehealth Use Among Cancer Survivors: Retrospective Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same journal

Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: Nomogram Development and Validation Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models for Breast and Cervical Cancers Communication: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study Assessing Linguistic Quality, Safety, and Accessibility.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same journal

Multi-Turn LLM-Based Conversational Agents for Patients with Cancer and Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same journal

Digital Intervention for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Advanced Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same journal

Online Intervention on Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals: Pilot Intervention Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

486

Open-Source, Step-Counting Algorithm for Smartphone Data Collected in Clinical and Nonclinical Settings: Algorithm

Marcin Straczkiewicz1, Nancy L Keating2,3, Embree Thompson4

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

JMIR Cancer
|November 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validates an open-source smartphone step-counting method, showing it reliably estimates steps across various conditions and populations, offering a scalable alternative to commercial trackers.

Keywords:
accelerometercanceropen-sourcesmartphonestep countvalidationwearable

More Related Videos

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

8.9K
Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

16.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

486
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

8.9K
Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

16.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Digital Health
  • Wearable Technology

Background:

  • Step counts are vital for public health and clinical research.
  • Commercial activity trackers have limitations in reproducibility and scalability.
  • Smartphones offer a promising, accessible alternative for step-counting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an open-source smartphone step-counting method.
  • Validation was performed against cross-body, visually assessed, and commercial wearable data.
  • The study assessed performance under diverse measurement conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 8 independent datasets from smartphones and accelerometers.
  • Employed a previously published smartphone step-counting algorithm using raw accelerometer data.
  • Bland-Altman analysis calculated mean bias and limits of agreement.

Main Results:

  • Cross-body validation showed a mean bias of -7.2 steps (-0.5%).
  • Visually assessed validation yielded a mean bias of -0.4 steps (0.1%).
  • Commercial wearable validation (Fitbit) demonstrated a 3.4% difference (-67.1 steps).

Conclusions:

  • The open-source smartphone method provides reliable step counts.
  • Accuracy is consistent across different sensor locations and measurement scenarios.
  • The method is validated for both healthy adults and cancer patients.