Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Fully Automated Leg Tracking in Freely Moving Insects using Feature Learning Leg Segmentation and Tracking FLLIT
Published on: April 23, 2020
LFighter: Defending against the label-flipping attack in federated learning
Najeeb Moharram Jebreel1, Josep Domingo-Ferrer1, David Sánchez1
1Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, CYBERCAT Center for Cybersecurity Research of Catalonia, UNESCO Chair in Data Privacy, Av. Països Catalans 26, E-43007 Tarragona, Catalonia.
Abstract:
Federated learning (FL) provides autonomy and privacy by design to participating peers, who cooperatively build a machine learning (ML) model while keeping their private data in their devices. However, that same autonomy opens the door for malicious peers to poison the model by conducting either untargeted or targeted poisoning attacks. The label-flipping (LF) attack is a targeted poisoning attack where the attackers poison their training data by flipping the labels of some examples from one class (i.e., the source class) to another (i.e., the target class). Unfortunately, this attack is easy to perform and hard to detect, and it negatively impacts the performance of the global model. Existing defenses against LF are limited by assumptions on the distribution of the peers' data and/or do not perform well with high-dimensional models. In this paper, we deeply investigate the LF attack behavior. We find that the contradicting objectives of attackers and honest peers on the source class examples are reflected on the parameter gradients corresponding to the neurons of the source and target classes in the output layer. This makes those gradients good discriminative features for the attack detection. Accordingly, we propose LFighter, a novel defense against the LF attack that first dynamically extracts those gradients from the peers' local updates and then clusters the extracted gradients, analyzes the resulting clusters, and filters out potential bad updates before model aggregation. Extensive empirical analysis on three data sets shows the effectiveness of the proposed defense regardless of the data distribution or model dimensionality. Also, LFighter outperforms several state-of-the-art defenses by offering lower test error, higher overall accuracy, higher source class accuracy, lower attack success rate, and higher stability of the source class accuracy. Our code and data are available for reproducibility purposes at https://github.com/NajeebJebreel/LFighter.
Related Concept Videos
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Labeling Emotion
Fundamental Attribution Error
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

