Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Brief slow-paced breathing improves working memory, mood, and stress in college students.

Anxiety, stress, and coping·2025

Same author

The Impact of Time of Night on Affect and Affective State Type: A Simulated Nightshift Study.

Journal of sleep research·2025

Same author

Leveraging machine learning to study how temperament scores predict pre-term birth status.

Global pediatrics·2024

Same author

The effect of compression on repetitive behaviors and task participation in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Same author

Loeys-Dietz syndrome caused by 1q41 deletion including TGFB2 is associated with a neurodevelopmental phenotype.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2022

Same author

Self-Control Measurement Methodologies: An Integrative Approach.

Psychological reports·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Published on: August 8, 2019

Time-of-day effects on speed and accuracy performance during simulated shiftwork.

June J Pilcher¹, Jennifer B Grandits¹, Margaret J Wilkes¹

¹Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.

Chronobiology International

|November 20, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Shift work negatively impacts performance, with night shifts causing worse outcomes than day shifts. Cognitive strategies, alongside circadian rhythms and sleep, are crucial for understanding shift work effects on safety and productivity.

Keywords:

Sleep deprivation circadian rhythm inverse efficiency score regulatory focus theory sleep pressure speed-accuracy tradeoff work motivation

More Related Videos

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Published on: August 8, 2019

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Occupational Health
Cognitive Psychology
Sleep Science

Background:

Performance on tasks requiring speed and accuracy varies across the 24-hour day, impacting shift workers and organizations.
Shift work is common in many industries, often leading to performance decrements due to circadian rhythm disruptions and sleep deprivation.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess performance on vigilance and math tasks during simulated night and day shifts.
To investigate the influence of circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and cognitive strategies on shift work performance.

Main Methods:

Two simulated work shifts (night and day) were employed with participants performing vigilance and math tasks.
Performance was measured by speed, accuracy, and inverse efficiency scores, with cognitive strategies also recorded.

Main Results:

Performance was significantly worse during the night shift compared to the day shift.
Inverse efficiency scores effectively captured the impact of circadian rhythms on performance during shift work.
Participants utilized cognitive strategies like speed-accuracy tradeoffs and varied regulatory foci based on time-of-day, shift type, and sleep status.

Conclusions:

Cognitive strategies play a significant role in how individuals adapt to shift work, influencing performance and safety.
Researchers and organizations must consider both physiological factors (circadian rhythms, sleep) and cognitive strategies when evaluating the effects of shift work.