Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

07:13
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
11.0K
A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets
Qing Ma1, Hongyuan Sun1, Zhe Chen1
1Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan, China.
Plos One
|November 27, 2023
Summary
This study introduces a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach using interval-valued picture fuzzy sets (IVPFS) to evaluate design concepts. This method effectively handles uncertainty and ambiguity in complex evaluations, leading to better product development decisions.
Area of Science:
- Engineering and Technology
- Decision Sciences
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Design concept assessment is crucial for business competitiveness but involves complex, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM).
- Existing MCDM methods struggle with the inherent uncertainty and ambiguity in evaluating design concepts due to subjective data.
- There is a need for robust methods to handle imprecise information in design evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an enhanced MCDM framework for design concept evaluation that addresses uncertainty and fuzziness.
- To integrate interval-valued picture fuzzy sets (IVPFS) into a comprehensive decision-making process for design concepts.
- To improve the accuracy and reliability of selecting optimal design concepts in complex scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Development of an evaluation indicator system based on literature and expert experience.
- Introduction of interval-valued picture fuzzy numbers (IVPFNs) and the IVPFOWIA operator.
- Application of an entropy weighting method for criteria weighting and an extended TOPSIS approach for alternative selection using IVPFS.
Main Results:
- A novel IVPFS-based MCDM method was successfully developed and applied to design concept evaluation.
- The proposed method demonstrated superior performance in handling complex and uncertain decision-making situations.
- Experiments and comparative analyses confirmed the effectiveness of the IVPFS augmentation in characterizing information ambiguity.
Conclusions:
- The IVPFS combined with improved MCDM techniques offers a powerful solution for design concept evaluation under uncertainty.
- This research provides a scientifically rigorous framework for more reliable and objective selection of design concepts.
- The proposed methodology enhances business decision-making, leading to more market-worthy products.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making
114
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
114
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
50
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
50
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K

