Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for Respiratory Muscle Strength Measures in Individuals With Multiple
Sandra Aguilar-Zafra1, Raúl Fabero-Garrido, Tamara Del Corral
1Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Motion in Brains Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain, and Téxum S.L. Physiotherapy Center, Coslada, Madrid, Spain (S.A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain (R.F.G.); and Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain (T.d.C., I.L.d.U.V.).
Background And Purpose:
The test-retest reliability and minimal detectable changes (MDCs) for respiratory muscle strength measures have not been determined in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study determined the test-retest reliability and MDCs for specific respiratory muscle strength measures, as well as their associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disability, dyspnea, and physical activity level measures in this population. In addition, the study examined differences in respiratory muscle strength between different degrees of disability.
Methods:
Sixty-one individuals with MS attended 2 appointments separated by 7 to 10 days. Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated by maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP), HRQoL by EuroQol-5D-5L (index and visual analog scale [EQ-VAS]), disability by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, dyspnea by the Medical Research Council scale, and physical activity levels by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Results:
Respiratory muscle strength measures had excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.92). The MDC for MIP is 15.42 cmH 2 O and for MEP is 17.84 cmH 2 O. Participants with higher respiratory muscle strength (MIP/MEP cmH 2 O and percentage of predicted values) had higher HRQoL ( r = 0.54-0.62, P < 0.01, EQ-5D-5L index; r = 0.30-0.42, P < 0.05, EQ-VAS); those with higher expiratory muscle strength (cmH 2 O and percentage of predicted values) had lower levels of disability ( r ≤ -0.66) and dyspnea ( r ≤ -0.61). There were differences in respiratory muscle strength between different degrees of disability ( P < 0.01; d ≥ 0.73).
Discussion And Conclusion:
Respiratory muscle strength measures provide excellent test-retest reliability in individuals with MS. MDCs can be interpreted and applied in the clinical setting. Low respiratory muscle strength can contribute to a poor HRQoL; specifically, expiratory muscle strength appears to have the strongest influence on disability status and dyspnea.
More Related Videos
09:37Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment RMCA in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: July 19, 2013
09:24Repeated Measurement of Respiratory Muscle Activity and Ventilation in Mouse Models of Neuromuscular Disease
Published on: April 17, 2017
Related Concept Videos
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:15Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement: