Identifying patterns of reported findings on long-term cardiac complications of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025
Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Boya Guo1, Chenya Zhao2, Mike Z He3
1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Insights
Long-term cardiac complications after COVID-19 are common, but reported prevalence varies significantly. Study quality, not just the complication, impacts reported findings, highlighting the need for rigorous research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Previous reviews have synthesized findings on long-term cardiac complications of COVID-19.
- However, the reporting and methodological quality of these studies have not been systematically evaluated.
Conclusions:
- A wide spectrum of long-term cardiac complications exists post-COVID-19.
- Reported findings are strongly related to study quality, sample size, and design.
- High-quality epidemiologic studies are crucial for accurate characterization and understanding of etiology.
Introduction:
Prior reviews synthesized findings of studies on long-term cardiac complications of COVID-19. However, the reporting and methodological quality of these studies has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on long-term cardiac complications of COVID-19 and examined patterns of reported findings by study quality and characteristics.
Methods:
We searched for studies examining long-term cardiac complications of COVID-19 that persisted for 4 weeks and over. A customized Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed to generate prevalence estimates of long-term cardiac complications across studies. Stratified analyses were further conducted to examine the prevalence of each complication by study quality and characteristics. The GRADE approach was used to determine the level of evidence for complications included in the meta-analysis.
Results:
A total number of 150 studies describing 57 long-term cardiac complications were included in this review, and 137 studies reporting 17 complications were included in the meta-analysis. Only 25.3% (n = 38) of studies were of high quality based on the NOS quality assessment. Chest pain and arrhythmia were the most widely examined long-term complications. When disregarding study quality and characteristics, summary prevalence estimates for chest and arrhythmia were 9.79% (95% CI 7.24-13.11) and 8.22% (95% CI 6.46-10.40), respectively. However, stratified analyses showed that studies with low-quality scores, small sample sizes, unsystematic sampling methods, and cross-sectional design were more likely to report a higher prevalence of complications. For example, the prevalence of chest pain was 22.17% (95% CI 14.40-32.55), 11.08% (95% CI 8.65-14.09), and 3.89% (95% CI 2.49-6.03) in studies of low, medium, and high quality, respectively. Similar patterns were observed for arrhythmia and other less examined long-term cardiac complications.
Conclusion:
There is a wide spectrum of long-term cardiac complications of COVID-19. Reported findings from previous studies are strongly related to study quality, sample sizes, sampling methods, and designs, underscoring the need for high-quality epidemiologic studies to characterize these complications and understand their etiology.
