Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

07:29
Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
Published on: November 22, 2019
8.3K
Measuring trust: a text analysis approach to compare, contrast, and select trust questionnaires
Areen Alsaid1, Mengyao Li2, Erin K Chiou3
1Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI, United States.
Frontiers in Psychology
|November 30, 2023
Summary
This study analyzed 46 trust questionnaires using word embeddings to identify common themes and differences. Results offer guidelines for selecting appropriate trust measurement tools, aiding research across various domains.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Information Science
Background:
- Trust is a critical construct in human-human and human-technology interactions.
- Numerous questionnaires exist to measure trust, but their differences are not well understood.
- Systematic comparison of trust measurement tools is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically explore differences and common themes across widely used trust questionnaires.
- To provide data-driven guidelines for selecting appropriate trust measurement instruments.
- To develop an interactive tool for exploring the semantic space of trust questionnaires.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a review to identify 46 trust questionnaires across Automation, Humans, and E-commerce domains.
- Utilized GloVe word embeddings to encode questionnaire items and entire questionnaires.
- Employed UMAP for dimensionality reduction and visualization, implemented in a web app.
Main Results:
- Developed a semantic lexicon of trust-related words.
- Provided recommendations for questionnaire selection based on item dispersion and domain/layer composition.
- Created an interactive web application for exploring trust questionnaires.
Conclusions:
- The study offers a novel method for comparing and selecting trust questionnaires.
- Insights into trust measurement can be gained from spoken dialogue or written comments.
- The findings facilitate more informed choices in trust research and application.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Cochran's Q Test
353
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
353
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K

