Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
What matters to you? Engaging with children in the James Lind Alliance Children's Cancer Priority Setting Partnership
Susie Aldiss1, Penelope Hart-Spencer2, Loveday Langton3
1School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Kate Granger Building, 30 Priestley Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7YH, UK. s.aldiss@surrey.ac.uk.
Insights
Directly involving children in setting research priorities for childhood cancer is achievable. Their input significantly shaped the Top 10 research priorities, focusing on improving hospital experiences and treatment accessibility.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Health Services Research
- Patient Engagement
Background:
- Previous priority-setting exercises engaged few children.
- The Children's Cancer Priority Setting Partnership aimed to directly elicit research priorities from children.
- This study informs methods for engaging children in future priority-setting initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine children's priorities for childhood cancer research.
- To evaluate methods for engaging children in priority-setting exercises.
- To inform future James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships.
Main Methods:
- Followed the James Lind Alliance process, including online surveys and a final workshop.
- Conducted a parallel process to collect and prioritize questions directly from children, using animations and child-friendly surveys.
- Engaged 61 children and young people with cancer and 10 siblings in surveys and workshops.
Main Results:
- Children submitted 252 questions, refined into 24 summary topics.
- A workshop with eight children further refined and prioritized questions.
- The top priority identified by children was improving the hospital experience, followed by cancer prevention, accessible treatments, early diagnosis, and emotional support.
Conclusions:
- Successfully involved children in setting priorities for childhood cancer research.
- Children's direct input is feasible and valuable for future research prioritization.
- The Children's Cancer Top 10 priorities, reflecting children's voices, should guide future research funding.
Background:
Previous priority setting exercises have sought to involve children, but in the final reporting, it is evident that few children had been engaged through the process. A primary aim in the Children's Cancer Priority Setting Partnership was to find out from children what they want research to focus on. We report on our experience to inform methods of engagement with children in future James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships and similar exercises.
Methods:
We followed the James Lind Alliance process, collecting and shortlisting questions via online surveys with adult survivors of childhood cancer, carers, and professionals, and holding a final workshop. Alongside this, a parallel process to collect and prioritise questions from children was undertaken. We created animations for parents/carers to explain the project and surveys to children, gathered questions via online surveys and held a workshop with children to identify their priorities.
Results:
Sixty-one children and young people with cancer and 10 siblings, aged 3-21 years, submitted 252 potential questions/topics via the surveys. Submissions were refined into 24 summary questions. These questions were discussed at a workshop with eight children; they also added more questions on topics of importance to them. Workshop participants prioritised the Top 5 questions; top priority was, 'How can we make being in hospital a better experience for children and young people? (like having better food, internet, toys, and open visiting so other family members can be more involved in the child's care)'. The Top 5 also included cancer prevention, treatments closer to home, early diagnosis, and emotional support. These questions were taken to the final workshop at which the Top 10 priorities were decided, all five children's priorities were reflected in the final Top 10.
Conclusions:
We have demonstrated that it is possible to successfully involve children directly in setting priorities for future research. Future priority setting exercises on topics relevant to children, should seek to include their views. The Children's Cancer Top 10 priorities reflect the voices of children and should inform the funding of future research.
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...

