Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

46
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
46
False Memories01:18

False Memories

90
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
90
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

37
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
37
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.4K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

75
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
75
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.0K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating Transport Layer Security 1.3 Optimization Strategies for 5G Cross-Border Roaming: A Comprehensive Security and Performance Analysis.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Formal Security Reassessment of the 5G-AKA-FS Protocol: Methodological Corrections and Augmented Verification Techniques.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

5G-AKA-FS: A 5G Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for Forward Secrecy.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

APSec1.0: Innovative Security Protocol Design with Formal Security Analysis for the Artificial Pancreas System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Decentralized Policy Coordination in Mobile Sensing with Consensual Communication.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

A Secrecy Transmission Protocol with Energy Harvesting for Federated Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.1K

SMDFbs: Specification-Based Misbehavior Detection for False Base Stations.

Hoonyong Park1, Philip Virgil Berrer Astillo2, Yongho Ko3

  • 1AUTOCRYPT Co., Ltd., Seoul 07241, Republic of Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces SMDFbs, a novel system to detect false base stations threatening cellular networks. SMDFbs achieves 98% accuracy in 5G Radio Access Network simulations, offering a sustainable solution.

Keywords:
5Gfalse base stationintrusion detection systemmachine learningspecification-based detection

More Related Videos

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

3.1K
Quantitative, Real-time Analysis of Base Excision Repair Activity in Cell Lysates Utilizing Lesion-specific Molecular Beacons
15:01

Quantitative, Real-time Analysis of Base Excision Repair Activity in Cell Lysates Utilizing Lesion-specific Molecular Beacons

Published on: August 6, 2012

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.1K
Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

3.1K
Quantitative, Real-time Analysis of Base Excision Repair Activity in Cell Lysates Utilizing Lesion-specific Molecular Beacons
15:01

Quantitative, Real-time Analysis of Base Excision Repair Activity in Cell Lysates Utilizing Lesion-specific Molecular Beacons

Published on: August 6, 2012

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Telecommunications Engineering
  • Network Security

Background:

  • Cellular technology enables advanced services like HD video streaming and autonomous driving.
  • False base stations pose a significant threat to the security and sustainability of cellular networks, particularly the Radio Access Network (RAN).
  • Existing detection methods may not be sufficient to counter these evolving threats.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a novel system, SMDFbs, for detecting false base stations in cellular networks.
  • To develop a behavior rule specification-based approach for identifying network anomalies caused by false base stations.
  • To compare the performance of SMDFbs against machine learning-based detection techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Derived behavior rules from normal base station operations.
  • Converted these rules into a state machine for anomaly detection.
  • Implemented and tested the SMDFbs system in a 5G RAN simulator.
  • Compared SMDFbs with seven machine learning-based false base station detection techniques.

Main Results:

  • SMDFbs achieved a detection accuracy of 98% in the 5G RAN simulator.
  • The proposed system demonstrated lower computational overhead compared to the evaluated machine learning algorithms.
  • Successfully identified and mitigated threats posed by false base stations.

Conclusions:

  • SMDFbs offers an effective and efficient solution for detecting false base stations in cellular networks.
  • The behavior rule specification and state machine approach provides a robust method for network anomaly detection.
  • The system contributes to enhancing the security and reliability of 5G Radio Access Networks.