Bridging the Gap Between Vitiligo Segmentation and Clinical Scores

Quantitative evaluation of vitiligo is crucial for assessing treatment response. Dermatologists evaluate vitiligo regularly to adjust their treatment plans, which requires extra work. Furthermore, the evaluations may not be objective due to inter- and intra-assessor variability. Though automatic vitiligo segmentation methods provide an objective evaluation, previous methods mainly focus on patch-wise images, and their results cannot be translated into clinical scores for treatment adjustment. Thus, full-body vitiligo segmentation needs to be developed for recording vitiligo changes in different body parts of a patient and for calculating the clinical scores. To bridge this gap, the first full-body vitiligo dataset with 1740 images, following the international vitiligo photo standard, was established. Compared with patch-wise images, full-body images have more complicated ambient light conditions and larger variances in lesion size and distribution. Additionally, in some hand and foot images, skin can be fully covered by either vitiligo or healthy skin. Previous patch-wise segmentation studies completely ignore these cases, as they assume that the contrast between vitiligo and healthy skin is available in each image for segmentation. To address the aforementioned challenges, the proposed algorithm in this study exploits a tailor-made contrast enhancement scheme and long-range comparison. Furthermore, a novel confidence score refinement module is proposed to manage images fully covered by vitiligo or healthy skin. Our results can be converted to clinical scores and used by clinicians. Compared to the state-of-the-art method, the proposed algorithm reduces the average per-image vitiligo involvement percentage error from 3.69% to 1.81%, and the top 10% per-image errors from 23.17% to 8.29%. Our algorithm achieves 1.17% and 3.11% for the mean and max error for the per-patient vitiligo involvement percentage, which is better than an experienced dermatologist's naked-eye evaluation.