Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

11:03
Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
Published on: June 24, 2022
5.6K
Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy: a cohort study
Emrullah Birgin1,2, Schaima Abdelhadi1, Steffen Seyfried1
1Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Surgical Endoscopy
|December 15, 2023
Summary
Minimally invasive repeat hepatectomies (MIRH) are feasible and safe after open hepatectomy. MIRH offers reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to open repeat hepatectomies (ORH).
Area of Science:
- Hepatobiliary surgery
- Surgical oncology
- Minimally invasive surgery
Background:
- Repeat hepatectomies are complex surgical procedures.
- Limited evidence exists for minimally invasive repeat hepatectomies (MIRH) following prior open hepatectomy.
- This study compares MIRH with open repeat hepatectomies (ORH) in patients with liver tumors previously treated with open liver resection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare postoperative outcomes of MIRH versus ORH in patients undergoing repeat liver resections.
- To evaluate the feasibility and safety of MIRH after previous open hepatectomy.
- To identify factors associated with the utilization of a minimally invasive approach in repeat hepatectomy.
Main Methods:
- A prospective database identified patients who underwent repeat hepatectomies after open liver resections (April 2018 - May 2023).
- Patients were stratified into MIRH or ORH groups based on intention to treat.
- Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification; logistic regression analyzed factors for MIRH utilization.
Main Results:
- Of 46 patients, 20 underwent MIRH and 26 underwent ORH. Advanced repeat hepatectomies were performed in 59% of patients.
- MIRH was associated with significantly less blood loss (450 ml vs. 600 ml) and shorter length of stay (5 days vs. 7 days).
- Resection margins were negative in all patients; postoperative complication rates were similar between MIRH and ORH groups (P=0.298).
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive repeat hepatectomy (MIRH) is a feasible and safe alternative to open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) after prior open liver resection.
- MIRH demonstrates advantages in reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays.
- The study provides evidence supporting MIRH for selected patients requiring repeat liver surgery.

