Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Comparison of Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes and Pink Esthetics After Immediate Implant Placement with Socket Shield
Purpose:
To compare volumetric changes in buccal soft tissue and pink esthetic scores after immediate implant placement performed with a socket shield technique (SST) or the conventional technique (CT).
Materials And Methods:
This parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial included 22 participants requiring replacement of a single maxillary incisor with an immediate implant. Immediate implants were placed via either the SST or the CT, with patients randomly allocated to one of the two groups. All implants underwent an immediate loading protocol. Definitive crowns were placed 6 months after implant placement. Scans of casts were recorded with a digital white light scanner before implant placement and at the end of 12 months. Volumetric changes to soft tissues on the buccal aspect were assessed by superimposition of the scanned cast. Esthetic evaluation of the soft tissue was done by evaluating the pink esthetic score (PES) before implant placement and 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using statistical software (Stata 16.0, StataCorp).
Results:
The mean volumetric change in buccal soft tissues at the end of 12 months in the SST group was -0.1520 ± 0.86 mm, and in the CT group, it was -0.643 ± 0.35 mm. The difference was statistically significant (P = .001). Higher PES was observed in the SST group at all time intervals. The difference was statistically significant at 6 months (P = .001) and 12 months (P = .007).
Conclusions:
The results of this study showed less volumetric changes in buccal soft tissues and higher PES when the SST is used rather than the CT.
