Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Refractive Predictability between Standard and Total Keratometry during the Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract
Hyunah Lim1, Joon Hyuck Jang1, Sanghyu Nam1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) showed similar accuracy for intraocular lens (IOL) calculations in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). The Barrett Universal II formula demonstrated the lowest prediction error for monofocal IOLs with enhanced intermediate function.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Refractive Surgery
Background:
- Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is a modern approach to cataract removal.
- Intraocular lens (IOL) calculation accuracy is crucial for achieving desired visual outcomes.
- Monofocal IOLs with enhanced intermediate function offer a broader range of vision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of IOL calculation formulas using standard keratometry (K) versus total keratometry (TK) in FLACS.
- To evaluate formula performance with a specific monofocal IOL designed for enhanced intermediate vision.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 125 eyes undergoing FLACS with a specific monofocal IOL.
- IOL refractive power calculated using Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Holladay 2 formulas with both K and TK data.
- Absolute prediction error (APE) compared between predicted and actual postoperative refractive outcomes.
Main Results:
- Mean APE ranged from 0.29 to 0.39 diopters (D), with no significant difference between K and TK measurements across formulas.
- The Barrett Universal II formula yielded the lowest mean APE.
- 70-80% of patients achieved refractive outcomes within 0.5 D of the target.
- No statistically significant difference in the percentage of eyes within 0.5 D APE between K and TK.
Conclusions:
- Keratometric measurements, including posterior corneal curvature (TK), did not offer additional advantages for this specific IOL in FLACS.
- Standard keratometry (K) is sufficient for accurate IOL calculations with this IOL type in FLACS.
More Related Videos
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
05:19Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
Published on: December 1, 2023