Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Semirigid and malleable penile implants.

M P Small

    The Urologic Clinics of North America
    |February 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Outpatient penile prosthesis implantation is safe and cost-effective for suitable candidates. Thorough patient evaluation and informed consent are crucial for successful outpatient procedures, reducing costs for patients and insurers.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Genetic structure and relationships in the snail species complex Littorina arcana hannaford ellis, L. compressa Jeffreys and L. saxatilis (Olivi) in the British isles using SSCPs of cytochrome-b fragments.

    Heredity·2000
    Same author

    Species relationships and population structure of Littorina saxatilis Olivi and L. tenebrosa Montagu in Ireland using single-strand conformational polymorphisms (SSCPs) of cytochrome b fragments.

    Molecular ecology·2000
    Same author

    Developmentally regulated proteolytic processing of a yolk glycoprotein complex in embryos of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

    Cell differentiation and development : the official journal of the International Society of Developmental Biologists·1989
    Same author

    Penile and scrotal inversion vaginoplasty for male to female transsexuals.

    Urology·1987
    Same author

    Surgical treatment of impotence with Small-Carrion prosthesis. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations.

    Urology·1984
    Same author

    Re: The failed penile prosthetic implantation despite technical success.

    The Journal of urology·1984
    Same journal

    An Unprecedented Era of Innovation in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Hubert Humphrey's Bladder Cancer: If He Could Have Time Traveled, Would that Have Changed the Outcome?

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Key Clinical Trials Shaping the Future of Superficial High-Risk Bladder Cancer Management.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Future Directions: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools in Bladder Cancer Care.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Patient-Centered Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Care.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Innovation

    Background:

    • The traditional inpatient setting for penile prosthesis implantation presents significant cost and logistical challenges.
    • Increasing healthcare costs necessitate exploring more cost-effective and efficient surgical settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing penile prosthesis implantation in an outpatient setting.
    • To identify key factors for successful outpatient penile prosthesis surgery.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of patient selection criteria for outpatient penile prosthesis implantation.
    • Analysis of potential complications and risk factors associated with the outpatient setting.
    • Assessment of cost-effectiveness compared to inpatient procedures.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Outpatient penile prosthesis implantation is viable for carefully selected patients with good surgical and postsurgical risk profiles.
    • Thorough patient evaluation, informed consent, and exclusion of high-risk individuals (e.g., certain diabetics) are essential.
    • Significant cost reductions for patients and insurance carriers are achievable.

    Conclusions:

    • Penile prosthesis implantation can be safely and reliably performed in an outpatient setting.
    • This approach offers a cost-effective alternative to inpatient procedures when managed by qualified surgeons.
    • Careful patient selection and management are paramount to ensure successful outcomes.