Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

468
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
468
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

406
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
406
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

340
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
340
Field Application of Global Positioning System01:28

Field Application of Global Positioning System

48
The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become an indispensable tool in fieldwork, offering unparalleled precision and efficiency for surveying, navigation, and infrastructure development. By harnessing signals from a constellation of satellites, GPS receivers determine the location of objects with remarkable speed and accuracy, often completing calculations within a second.Advantages of Modern GPS TechnologyContemporary GPS receivers are designed to meet the practical demands of field...
48
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

75
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
75
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys01:30

Types of Global Positioning System Surveys

59
GPS surveying methods vary in application, accuracy, and data collection techniques, catering to diverse surveying and mapping needs. Static GPS, kinematic GPS, and real-time kinematic (RTK) surveying are widely used. Each technique offers distinct advantages.Static GPS involves placing one receiver at a known reference point and another at the target point. It collects exact positional data by observing multiple satellite ranges over an extended period, achieving centimeter-level accuracy for...
59

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Absolute IOP/EOP Estimation Models without Initial Information of Various Smart City Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Feature Matching Combining Radiometric and Geometric Characteristics of Images, Applied to Oblique- and Nadir-Looking Visible and TIR Sensors of UAV Imagery.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Automated Algorithm for Removing Clutter Objects in Mms Point Cloud for 3D Road Mapping.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Object Distance Estimation Using a Single Image Taken from a Moving Rolling Shutter Camera.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.0K

Coarse Alignment Methodology of Point Cloud Based on Camera Position/Orientation Estimation Model.

Suhong Yoo1, Namhoon Kim2

  • 1Department of Drone and GIS Engineering, Namseoul University, 91, Daehak-ro, Seonghwan-eup, Seobuk-gu, Cheonan-si 31020, Republic of Korea.

Journal of Imaging
|December 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for coarse alignment of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds. While achieving similar position accuracy to semi-automatic methods, it requires further refinement for optimal registration.

Keywords:
LiDARcoarse alignmentmappingplace recognitionpoint cloud registrationpose estimationsensor fusion for localization

More Related Videos

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

487
Three-dimensional Super Resolution Microscopy of F-actin Filaments by Interferometric PhotoActivated Localization Microscopy iPALM
11:57

Three-dimensional Super Resolution Microscopy of F-actin Filaments by Interferometric PhotoActivated Localization Microscopy iPALM

Published on: December 1, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.0K
Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

487
Three-dimensional Super Resolution Microscopy of F-actin Filaments by Interferometric PhotoActivated Localization Microscopy iPALM
11:57

Three-dimensional Super Resolution Microscopy of F-actin Filaments by Interferometric PhotoActivated Localization Microscopy iPALM

Published on: December 1, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Geomatics Engineering
  • Computer Vision
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Accurate 3D reconstruction relies on precise registration of point clouds.
  • Coarse alignment is a critical prerequisite for effective point cloud registration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel methodology for the coarse alignment of LiDAR point clouds.
  • To estimate the position and orientation of LiDAR stations for improved registration.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the pinhole camera model and a position/orientation estimation algorithm.
  • Employed LiDAR camera images for ground control points and reference station point clouds.
  • Compared proposed methodology with semi-automatic registration using total station measurements.

Main Results:

  • Mean LiDAR position error of 0.072 m, comparable to semi-automatic registration (0.070 m).
  • Proposed method achieved 0.124 m mean registration accuracy, while semi-automatic reached 0.072 m.
  • Refined alignment using the proposed method resulted in an average point-to-point distance of 0.0117 m.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methodology provides a viable approach for coarse alignment of LiDAR point clouds.
  • Semi-automatic registration offers superior accuracy due to integrated coarse and refined alignment.
  • Further refinement steps are necessary to match the accuracy of advanced semi-automatic techniques.