Who With Whom: Matching Therapist and Client in Correctional Institutions

The current study investigated variables that are being considered when assigning psychotherapists to individuals convicted of sexual and violent offences. Its main aim is to inform practitioners and researchers alike of potentially beneficial combinations between therapist and client and infer hypotheses for future studies. A mixed-methods approach, combining interviews and a follow-up questionnaire, was employed. Nineteen interviews with forensic practitioners working in socio-therapeutic facilities in Germany were conducted. Relevant matching criteria were extracted from all interviews. 1.) Capacities of therapist, 2.) therapist's professional background, 3.) (severity of) clinical disorder, 4.) personal fit, and 5.) fit of client into existing groups emerged as top five matching criteria. Directive therapists were viewed as a good match for antisocial or psychopathic offenders. Opinions diverged regarding personality similarity or complementarity in client-therapist dyads. A flexible matching approach may offer unique strengths to enhance treatment outcome. Implications and ideas for future research are discussed.