Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Expert-centered Evaluation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation
Katharina V Hoebel1, Christopher P Bridge1, Sara Ahmed1
1From the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology (K.V.H., C.P.B., A.K., K.I.L., K.C., J.P., B.R.R., E.R.G., J.K.C.), and Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (O.A., A.K., K.I.L., E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, Charlestown, MA 02129; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (K.V.H., K.C., J.P.); MGH and BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (C.P.B., J.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology (S.A., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (C.C.), and Department of Neuroradiology (J.M.J.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Departments of Radiology (R.Y.H.) and Neurology (T.T.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.P.); and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (J.K.C.).
Abstract:
Purpose To present results from a literature survey on practices in deep learning segmentation algorithm evaluation and perform a study on expert quality perception of brain tumor segmentation. Materials and Methods A total of 180 articles reporting on brain tumor segmentation algorithms were surveyed for the reported quality evaluation. Additionally, ratings of segmentation quality on a four-point scale were collected from medical professionals for 60 brain tumor segmentation cases. Results Of the surveyed articles, Dice score, sensitivity, and Hausdorff distance were the most popular metrics to report segmentation performance. Notably, only 2.8% of the articles included clinical experts' evaluation of segmentation quality. The experimental results revealed a low interrater agreement (Krippendorff α, 0.34) in experts' segmentation quality perception. Furthermore, the correlations between the ratings and commonly used quantitative quality metrics were low (Kendall tau between Dice score and mean rating, 0.23; Kendall tau between Hausdorff distance and mean rating, 0.51), with large variability among the experts. Conclusion The results demonstrate that quality ratings are prone to variability due to the ambiguity of tumor boundaries and individual perceptual differences, and existing metrics do not capture the clinical perception of segmentation quality. Keywords: Brain Tumor Segmentation, Deep Learning Algorithms, Glioblastoma, Cancer, Machine Learning Clinical trial registration nos. NCT00756106 and NCT00662506 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
More Related Videos
12:50Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly
Published on: April 14, 2014
04:25Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
Published on: December 15, 2023