Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020
A Convolutional Neural Network Model for Distinguishing Hemangioblastomas From Other Cerebellar-and-Brainstem Tumors
Yaru Sheng1, Botao Zhao2, Haixia Cheng3
1Radiology Department of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Hemangioblastoma (HB) is a highly vascularized tumor most commonly occurring in the posterior cranial fossa, requiring accurate preoperative diagnosis to avoid accidental intraoperative hemorrhage and even death.
Purpose:
To accurately distinguish HBs from other cerebellar-and-brainstem tumors using a convolutional neural network model based on a contrast-enhanced brain MRI dataset.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Population:
Four hundred five patients (182 = HBs; 223 = other cerebellar-and brainstem tumors): 305 cases for model training, and 100 for evaluation.
Field Strength/Sequence:
3 T/contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI + C).
Assessment:
A CNN-based 2D classification network was trained by using sliced data along the z-axis. To improve the performance of the network, we introduced demographic information, various data-augmentation methods and an auxiliary task to segment tumor region. Then, this method was compared with the evaluations performed by experienced and intermediate-level neuroradiologists, and the heatmap of deep feature, which indicates the contribution of each pixel to model prediction, was visualized by Grad-CAM for analyzing the misclassified cases.
Statistical Tests:
The Pearson chi-square test and an independent t-test were used to test for distribution difference in age and sex. And the independent t-test was exploited to evaluate the performance between experts and our proposed method. P value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
The trained network showed a higher accuracy for identifying HBs (accuracy = 0.902 ± 0.031, F1 = 0.891 ± 0.035, AUC = 0.926 ± 0.040) than experienced (accuracy = 0.887 ± 0.013, F1 = 0.868 ± 0.011, AUC = 0.881 ± 0.008) and intermediate-level (accuracy = 0.827 ± 0.037, F1 = 0.768 ± 0.068, AUC = 0.810 ± 0.047) neuroradiologists. The recall values were 0.910 ± 0.050, 0.659 ± 0.084, and 0.828 ± 0.019 for the trained network, intermediate and experienced neuroradiologists, respectively. Additional ablation experiments verified the utility of the introduced demographic information, data augmentation, and the auxiliary-segmentation task.
Data Conclusion:
Our proposed method can successfully distinguish HBs from other cerebellar-and-brainstem tumors and showed diagnostic efficiency comparable to that of experienced neuroradiologists.
Evidence Level:
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
More Related Videos
12:50Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly
Published on: April 14, 2014
04:25Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
Published on: December 15, 2023