Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Participant Misrepresentation in Online Focus Groups: Red Flags and Proactive Measures
Lesley Andrew1, Emily Gizzarelli2, Mohamed Estai3
1Senior lecturer in the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Edith Cowan University.
Abstract:
Covid-19 public health measures prompted a significant increase in online research. This approach has several benefits over face-to-face data-collection methods, including lower cost and wider geographical reach of participants. Yet when the online data-collection instrument is a survey, there are also well-documented drawbacks of participant misrepresentation and related data-authenticity issues. However, the scholarly literature has not looked at participant misrepresentation in online focus-group empirical research. This case study communicates a concerning situation that arose during our research project: dishonest participant behavior threatened the integrity and validity of our data collected through online focus-group sessions as well as e-surveys. We describe the study context, initial red flags alerting us to the issue, subsequent investigations, and implications for research ethics, funding, and data quality. We conclude with a discussion of potential steps to safeguard future online focus-group research against similar issues.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Confirmation Biases
Groupthink
Stereotype Content Model

