Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain PPOP
Published on: January 27, 2010
Differences between Japanese new criteria and pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC scores for obstetrical DIC
Mamoru Morikawa1, Akio Kamiya2, Aya Yoshida2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan. mmamoru@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.
The new Japanese diagnostic criteria for obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (tentative version) were released in June 2022. We aimed to demonstrate the differences in characteristics between women with DIC diagnosed using the new Japanese criteria and those diagnosed using the pregnancy-specific modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis DIC score, also known as the pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC score, which was released in 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, all participants were retrospectively diagnosed based on both criteria. Six women were diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on both criteria (Group A). Of the 43 women diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on the worldwide criteria, 36 were diagnosed with non-obstetrical DIC based on the new Japanese criteria (Group B). Group A had significantly lower fibrinogen levels and significantly higher prothrombin time differences and scores of underlying diseases (particularly postpartum hemorrhage with coagulopathy) and laboratory findings than Group B. Additionally, Group A had significantly higher rates of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion therapy for obstetrical DIC and more transfusions of fresh frozen plasma and/or cryoprecipitate, red blood cells and PC than Group B. Thus, the new Japanese criteria detected more severe cases of obstetrical DIC compared with the worldwide criteria.
The new Japanese diagnostic criteria for obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (tentative version) were released in June 2022. We aimed to demonstrate the differences in characteristics between women with DIC diagnosed using the new Japanese criteria and those diagnosed using the pregnancy-specific modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis DIC score, also known as the pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC score, which was released in 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, all participants were retrospectively diagnosed based on both criteria. Six women were diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on both criteria (Group A). Of the 43 women diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on the worldwide criteria, 36 were diagnosed with non-obstetrical DIC based on the new Japanese criteria (Group B). Group A had significantly lower fibrinogen levels and significantly higher prothrombin time differences and scores of underlying diseases (particularly postpartum hemorrhage with coagulopathy) and laboratory findings than Group B. Additionally, Group A had significantly higher rates of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion therapy for obstetrical DIC and more transfusions of fresh frozen plasma and/or cryoprecipitate, red blood cells and PC than Group B. Thus, the new Japanese criteria detected more severe cases of obstetrical DIC compared with the worldwide criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...

