Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

04:24
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
11.6K
Mobile and Computer-Based Applications for Rehabilitation Monitoring and Self-Management After Knee Arthroplasty:
Sabhya Pritwani1, Purnima Shrivastava1, Shruti Pandey1
1Department of Research & Development, The George Institute for Global Health India, Delhi, India.
JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth
|January 26, 2024
Summary
Mobile health technologies aid knee replacement recovery but are limited to high-income countries. Future development should involve end-users for accessible, cost-effective rehabilitation in resource-poor settings.
Area of Science:
- Digital health interventions
- Rehabilitation technology
- Health informatics
Background:
- Post-knee replacement rehabilitation necessitates health information, social support, and professional monitoring.
- Mobile health (mHealth) and computer-based technologies are utilized for rehabilitation and remote monitoring.
- The scope of technology use in knee replacement rehabilitation in low- and middle-income settings is largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of existing technologies for post-knee replacement rehabilitation.
- To map the features and functionality of current mHealth and computer-based interventions.
- To determine user perspectives on telerehabilitation and technology for self-management to inform future intervention development.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review methodology was employed, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
- Searched Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies from 2001 onwards.
- Included original research on mobile or computer-based technologies, categorizing studies into validation, clinical evaluation, and end-user feedback.
Main Results:
- 158 studies from high-income settings were included; no studies originated from low- and middle-income settings.
- Technologies primarily offered education, exercise guidance, pain/activity/adherence monitoring, healthcare communication, and goal setting.
- Commonly validated technologies included range of motion assessment and gait analysis; end-user involvement was reported in only 14 studies.
Conclusions:
- Existing mobile and computer-based technologies support knee replacement rehabilitation but are confined to high-income settings.
- These technologies may not be directly applicable to low-income settings due to differing contexts.
- A systematic needs assessment, inclusive of end-users throughout development and evaluation, is crucial for accessible and cost-effective rehabilitation in resource-poor settings.

