Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Comparing the Performance of World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview Substance Abuse Module
Sharon Levy1, Machiko Minegishi, Melissa Brogna
1From the Division of Addiction Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (SL, MM, MB, ERW); Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (SL, ERW); Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (ERW); The National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD (GS); The Emmes Company, Rockville, MD (JM); Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA (RW); Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (RW); and Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (ERW).
Objectives:
The World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview Substance Abuse Module (WMH-CIDI-SAM) is commonly used as a criterion standard measure for substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses, although the accuracy of this tool when used with adolescents is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement between SUD diagnoses for adolescents made by WMH-CIDI-SAM and those made by specialists based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) ( DSM-5 ) SUD criteria during an SUD evaluation.
Methods:
Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years presenting to an outpatient SUD program for youth were administered the WMH-CIDI-SAM by a trained research assistant, and results were compared with diagnoses made by experienced clinicians based on DSM-5 SUD criteria during an initial SUD evaluation. Chance-corrected concordance was estimated using the κ coefficient for the comparisons.
Results:
The level of concordance between the WMH-CIDI-SAM interview and the clinician diagnosis based on DSM-5 SUD criteria were fair to moderate for alcohol use disorder and tobacco use disorder and poor for cannabis use disorder. Three of 11 WMH-CIDI-SAM item constructs showed poor concordance with clinician diagnosis.
Conclusions:
Interpreting the diagnostic criteria for SUDs, particularly cannabis use disorders, is nuanced, and the meaning of the criteria may be misunderstood by adolescents. Further evaluation of the performance of the WMH-CIDI-SAM diagnostic interview for identifying cannabis use disorders in adolescents is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Drug Dependence

