Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

07:05
Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
Published on: October 27, 2016
9.2K
Visualization for Trust in Machine Learning Revisited: The State of the Field in 2023
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
|January 31, 2024
Summary
Visualization techniques are crucial for trustworthy machine learning (ML). This study analyzes 542 techniques, revealing a growing trend in using visualization to enhance ML model explainability and trust.
Area of Science:
- Information Visualization
- Visual Analytics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Visualization for explainable and trustworthy machine learning is a key research area.
- A previous report in 2020 documented 200 techniques.
- This study builds upon that work by analyzing an expanded dataset.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present updated findings on visualization techniques for machine learning as of fall 2023.
- To analyze trends and insights from an expanded dataset of 542 techniques.
- To identify and discuss eight open challenges in the field.
Main Methods:
- Systematic collection and categorization of peer-reviewed articles on visualization techniques for machine learning.
- Analysis of an updated dataset of 542 techniques using a schema of 119 categories.
- Examination of trends and insights from fall 2023 data.
Main Results:
- The field shows a rapidly growing trend in visualization techniques for increasing trust in machine learning models over the past three years.
- Visualization aids in improving popular model explainability methods.
- Visualization is effective in examining new deep learning architectures.
Conclusions:
- Visualization plays a vital role in advancing explainable and trustworthy machine learning.
- Continued research is needed to address identified open challenges.
- The trend indicates increasing reliance on visual methods for ML development and validation.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
555
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
555
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K
Distribution Reliability and Automation
107
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
107
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Confidence Coefficient
7.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.6K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K

