Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Contemporary Psychology

Contemporary Psychology

Psychology explores human behavior and mental processes through various lenses, each offering unique insights. This overview examines key subfields, including biopsychology, evolutionary, developmental, personality, and social psychology, highlighting their approaches and contributions to understanding complex human behaviors.
Biopsychology
Biopsychology, also known as biological psychology or behavioral neuroscience, focuses on the biological underpinnings of behavior and mental processes. It...

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

Deindividuation

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Heterogeneous learning strategies interact with social network structure and problem complexity to benefit collective search.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Cultural tightness and social cohesion under coevolving beliefs, behaviors, and preferences.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Collective moderation of hate, toxicity, and extremity in online discussions.

PNAS nexus·2025

Same author

Social networks affect redistribution decisions and polarization.

PNAS nexus·2025

Same author

Networks of beliefs: An integrative theory of individual- and social-level belief dynamics.

Psychological review·2024

Same author

Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty.

Science advances·2023

Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

Sampling complex social and behavioral phenomena.

Henrik Olsson^1,2, Mirta Galesic^1,2

¹Complexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|February 4, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Prior literature has limits for integrative experiment design. Social phenomena adapt, complicating theory and modeling, and measuring errors without replication is challenging.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Area of Science:

Integrative experimental design
Social and behavioral science methodology

Background:

Relying solely on prior literature can restrict the scope of integrative experimental design.
The dynamic nature of social and behavioral phenomena presents unique challenges for theoretical frameworks and modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the limitations of existing literature in defining the design space for integrative experiments.
To discuss the implications of adaptive social phenomena for theory and modeling in experimental design.
To address the difficulties in quantifying measurement errors and biases without replication.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of limitations in prior literature for experimental design.
Discussion of the adaptive characteristics of social and behavioral systems.
Examination of measurement challenges, including random errors and lab-related biases.

Main Results:

Prior literature may not adequately capture the full design space for complex integrative experiments.
Adaptive phenomena necessitate flexible theoretical approaches and dynamic models.
Accurate error and bias assessment is difficult without replication, impacting measurement validity.

Conclusions:

Integrative experimental design requires moving beyond static literature reviews.
Theory and modeling must account for the adaptive nature of social and behavioral systems.
Methodological advancements are needed to address measurement error and bias in non-replicable settings.