Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

727
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
727
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

179
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
179

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comments on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Requirements.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
Same author

Minimum requirements for continuous glucose monitors: What does it mean?

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2025
Same author

Continuous Glucose Monitor Agreement Rates: A Questionable Metric.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2025
Same author

Validation of the Diabetes Technology Society Error Grid.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2025
Same author

The Diabetes Technology Society Error Grid and Trend Accuracy Matrix for Glucose Monitors.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2024
Same author

Proposed Recommendations for Continuous Glucose Monitor Method Comparisons.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

18.8K

Comparing Clinical Accuracy and Analytical Accuracy Between Continuous Glucose Monitors.

Jan S Krouwer1

  • 1Krouwer Consulting, Sherborn, MA, USA.

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
|February 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated two continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), assessing both clinical and analytical accuracy. Results offer a template for comparing CGM device performance and user-readability.

Keywords:
CGMMARDdiabeteserror gridinsulinmethod comparison

More Related Videos

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice
03:25

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice

Published on: February 24, 2023

5.4K
Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
06:55

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

18.8K
Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice
03:25

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice

Published on: February 24, 2023

5.4K
Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
06:55

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are vital for diabetes management.
  • Accurate glucose readings are crucial for effective treatment decisions.
  • Comparative studies are needed to guide user and clinician choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of two distinct continuous glucose monitoring systems.
  • To evaluate both the clinical and analytical accuracy of CGM devices.
  • To establish a framework for future CGM comparative studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a mixed-methods approach with laboratory (CGM vs. YSI) and home (CGM vs. glucose meter) data.
  • Employed error grid analysis to assess clinical accuracy.
  • Quantified analytical accuracy by examining the spread of CGM versus reference differences.
  • Reported the percentage of time no result was obtained for each device.

Main Results:

  • Provided detailed analysis of clinical and analytical accuracy for both CGM systems.
  • Quantified the frequency of missed readings, an important usability metric.
  • Demonstrated the utility of error grid analysis in evaluating CGM clinical performance.
  • Highlighted differences in the spread of CGM versus reference values.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers a comprehensive template for evaluating and comparing CGM technologies.
  • Both clinical and analytical accuracy metrics are essential for a complete performance assessment.
  • Understanding device accuracy and data availability is key for optimal diabetes self-management.
  • Manufacturer involvement in study design and analysis was noted.