Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
[Sealing effect of GuttaFlow2 in curved root canals]
1Department of Cariology and Endodoontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Objective:
To evaluate the sealing ability of GuttaFlow2 single cone obturation in curved root canals.
Methods:
(1) Slight, moderate and severe curved 3D printed root canals were made. After instrumentation, these samples were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 10) according to different root canal filling techniques: GuttaFlow2 single cone group (GF2) and AH-Plus warm vertical compation group (WVC). All the samples were sectioned at 2 mm to apex (the apical of the root), 4 mm, 6 mm to apex (the middle of the root) and 8 mm to apex (the coronal of the root). The filling void areas were observed by stereomicroscope, and the percentages of void areas in each section were calculated by ImageJ 1.52a. (2) Forty-eight roots of extracted adult molars were selected. After instrumentation, they were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 8): GF2 group and WVC group. Before root canal filling, the sea-lers were mixed with Rhodamine B dye for visualization under confocal laser scanning microscope. All samples were sectioned at 2 mm to apex (the apical of the root), 5 mm to apex (the middle of the root) and 8 mm to apex(the coronal of the root). Then, the percentages of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in each section were calculated.
Results:
At the apical of the root, there were no obvious voids in slight, moderate and severe curved canals in the GF2 group and the WVC group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the middle of the root, there was no significant difference in the percentages of void areas between the two filling methods, but at the coronal of the root, there were more voids in the slight curved root canal in the GF2 group than in the WVC group, and the difference was significant (P = 0.009). The percentages of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules of slight, moderate and severe curved root canals in the GF2 group were 36.10%, 55.80%, 65.08%, respectively. And they were all higher than those in the WVC group (15.78%, 20.70%, 15.61%), respectively, the difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.001). At the middle of the root, the percentages of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules of slight and moderate curved root canals in GF2 group were also significantly higher than those in the WVC group (P = 0.001). At the coronal of the root, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
GuttaFlow2 filling technique has the same sealing effect on the root canal at the apical and middle of the root as the warm vertical technique, but has a better sealing effect on the dentin tubules, especially for severe curved root canal.
