Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026

Same author

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

From prediction to control: Age-related dissociations between implicit regularity encoding and attentional modulation during perception-action integration.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same author

A Multiplexed Neural Code Governs Dynamic Perception-Action Reconfiguration during Response Inhibition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

Statistical learning of motor preparation.

Jan Theeuwes¹, Changrun Huang¹, Christian Frings²

¹Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

|February 20, 2024

Summary

Individuals unconsciously learn to associate specific motor responses with target locations. This statistical learning demonstrates automatic adaptation to environmental regularities, expanding our understanding of cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human Cognition

Background:

Statistical learning is crucial for human cognition, enabling extraction of environmental regularities.
Previous research shows attentional biases toward likely target locations and away from distractors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if individuals can learn to associate specific motor responses with target locations.
To determine if this learning is location-based or shape-based.
To assess the conscious awareness of learned response biases.

Main Methods:

Adapted the additional singleton paradigm to link specific target locations with probabilistic motor responses.
Participants performed tasks where target location predicted response likelihood.
Assessed participant awareness of the response-location contingencies.

Main Results:

Participants successfully learned to associate specific motor responses with target locations.
Evidence suggests location, not target shape, drives the learned response bias.
Participants exhibited minimal conscious awareness of the learned biases.

Conclusions:

Location-based statistical learning influences motor response selection unconsciously.
Findings support event coding theory and demonstrate automatic adaptation to environmental regularities.
This study expands the scope of statistical learning to include motor response associations.